Logo Home About Tradex The Tradex Advantage Products & Services Education & Awareness Shop, Prep, Cook
TRADEX FOODS BLOG
Cutting – current and sometimes controversial. Check in often.

As you may or may not be aware, deceptive practices have reached epidemic proportions in the seafood industry. We believe that education is key to creating a reputable industry.  And so, over the next 12 weeks, we will be educating on 12 deceptive practices (1 per week) that are commonly used in the seafood industry. We will explain what they are, why they are used, how to identify them and what you can do to make sure that the seafood you buy is top-quality!

Species Substitution

Species substitution, seafood mislabeling – whatever you want to call it – this is one deceptive practice that consumers and industry are more aware of. Recent studies about seafood mislabeling have dominated news headlines.  The Boston Globe investigation uncovered species substitution at many local restaurants.  And last year in Canada, a CBC reporter put supermarket fish to the test in the Something’s Fishy report.  These are just two studies, but more have been done and most reveal that fish-tablemislabeled seafood is more common than the average consumer would think. The table aside depicts the results of an investigation of seafood bought at retail stores and restaurants in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.

So what does species substitution mean exactly? Essentially, it means substituting one species for another – normally a cheaper species is substituted for a more expensive one – as a means to boost profits.  For example, the various Sole & Flounder species range in price and quality and are therefore frequently substituted. Often, even the retailer and restaurants selling the fish to end-consumers are unaware that the fish they are selling has been mislabeled.

What does this mean for the end-users? Aside from paying a high price for a lesser quality product, mislabeled fish can impact flavour, texture, portioning, yield and recipe response.

How can you be sure that the fish you buy is what you paid for? For even the most experience seafood purchasers, this can be difficult. Especially when buying frozen fish. The only real way to determine if a species has been substituted is with DNA analysis.  In an effort to provide our customers with full transparency, Tradex Foods conducts DNA testing on all SINBAD production out of China. SINBAD is our in-house brand produced under stringent quality standards in Asia.  Does your supplier provide full transparency?

Thanks for educating yourself on deceptive practices – at Tradex Foods we believe that furthering education and awareness is the key to eliminating seafood fraud and to creating a long-lasting, reputable and profitable industry. BUY SMART & EAT MORE SEAFOOD!

Last Updated (Friday, 02 December 2011 22:45)

Read more...

 

fish-counterIt’s no secret that seafood fraud is rampant. Industry continually calls on regulatory bodies – including the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and the US Food & Drug Administration – to step up seafood inspections and hold suppliers and importers accountable. And yet, change has been slow within these bureaucratic organizations and dishonest companies continue to get away with deception. How can we create momentum in the fight against fraud? We need a catalyst - and that catalyst is the general public.

That’s right – people actually buying seafood from retailers and consuming it at restaurants are the answer to our problems. I bet if we were to ask a stranger on the street what they knew about “species substitution” or “short net weights”, a look of confusion would cross their face. The fact of the matter is that while it is not uncommon for various seafood media outlets – such as SeafoodSource, Intrafish, SeafoodNews  - to report on seafood fraud, these stories rarely reach end-consumers. For instance, how often do stories about companies and individuals indicted for seafood fraud make the front page of major newspapers or the seven o’clock news?

We applaud recent efforts made by Oceana with their “Bait & Switch Report” which was picked up by many prominent US newspapers, including the New York Times and Washington Post. These are the types of initiatives that are needed to create momentum and political influence within regulatory bodies.

Last Updated (Friday, 16 September 2011 18:16)

Read more...

 

Atlantic_SalmonQ: What was your first reaction when you heard about AquaBounty Technologies’ genetically modified Salmon intended to be used for food?

A: When I first heard about the concept of GM Salmon I was amazed that a technology had been developed to grow fish to market size in half the amount of time.  However, as an avid seafood
consumer myself, I immediately wondered about public safety implications. Now, even though the FDA’s preliminarily findings are that GM Salmon is safe for consumption – I am still a bit skeptical.

Q: Other types of food products – such as corn and soybeans - are genetically modified. Are you skeptical about these products?

A: (Laughs) That’s a tough question. Genetically modified plant products have been around for so long that I don’t remember what my reaction was when they came out – or if I was even aware of that milestone. I guess the fact that GM Salmon is new and that it is the first GM animal food that may be approved for consumption is what has me wondering about food safety. I also wonder that if when GM plants were approved for human consumption, those industries reacted as ours is today.

Last Updated (Wednesday, 10 August 2011 20:57)

Read more...

 
More Articles...